https://us.vocuspr.com/Publish/523718/vcsPRAsset_523718_85120_3c9695eb-03fb-4f99-a31c-8fee35dce79e_0.jpg Rice University Office of Public Affairs / News & Media Relations
David Ruth 713-348-6327 firstname.lastname@example.org
Jeff Falk 713-348-6775 email@example.com
Baker Institute expert: Mercantilist approach to trade policy ‘will not bode well for US energy security’
HOUSTON – (Dec. 18, 2017) – While it is difficult to postulate how President Donald Trump’s approach to international trade will actually play out, any policies that raise barriers to trade "will not bode well for U.S. energy security,” according to a new paper by an expert at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.
http://news.rice.edu/files/2017/12/1218_ENERGY-21edln3.jpg“The Trump Administration, Trade and Energy,” (http://eneken.ieej.or.jp/data/7635.pdf) authored by Kenneth Medlock (http://bakerinstitute.org/experts/kenneth-b-medlock-iii) , senior director of the institute’s Center for Energy Studies, was recently published in the Institute of Energy Economics’ Energy Journal. The paper examines the degree to which the Trump administration is pursuing a mercantilist agenda and the implications of this for trade, energy markets and energy-market participants.
Mercantilism is the theory that trade generates wealth and is stimulated by the accumulation of surpluses (profitable trade balances), which a government should encourage through protectionist policies. When corporations, politicians and special interests demand control over imports through higher duties to protect local jobs and industries, they are resorting to mercantilism.
In his paper, Medlock analyzes potential implications of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) renegotiation; threats to impose import tariffs and destination-based taxes, including the recently discussed Border Adjustment Tax; the formal withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership; and the president’s indicated preference toward bilateral trade negotiations.
Medlock said NAFTA has helped integrate the North American energy market. “U.S. trade with Canada and Mexico in energy commodities currently exceeds $140 billion annually, and last year the U.S. had an energy trade surplus with Mexico of more than $11 billion,” wrote Medlock, the James A. Baker III and Susan G. Baker Fellow in Energy and Resource Economics at the institute. “Mexico is currently the recipient of the majority of U.S. natural gas exports, and these volumes are expected to increase further in the coming years as new pipeline infrastructure is completed.”
If NAFTA remains intact, cross-border natural gas export infrastructure will continue to be “rubber-stamped” as it will not be subject to a national interest determination by the U.S. Department of Energy, Medlock said. “Any abolition of NAFTA would jeopardize future exports by subjecting them to study prior to being sanctioned,” he wrote.
NAFTA could also affect joint development opportunities in the Gulf of Mexico. “If NAFTA renegotiations were unsuccessful, U.S. Gulf Coast-sourced equipment and services for the offshore Gulf of Mexico would be disadvantaged,” Medlock wrote. “This would be exacerbated if Mexico responded by enforcing stricter local content requirements for Mexican Gulf of Mexico developments. Not only would this slow the pace of development in the Mexican offshore longer term, it would also reduce the economic benefit that would otherwise be realized in the U.S. Both outcomes compromise North American energy security.”
Globally, it is unlikely the Trump administration will limit access by foreign countries to U.S. energy exports, Medlock said. “It is more likely that the administration will take steps to facilitate energy exports,” he wrote. “This will carry spillover benefits for global energy markets and enhance energy security more broadly. However, if trade policy becomes restrictive in other dimensions -- solar panels, steel, etc. -- one wonders what the ramifications may be for U.S. exports of oil and gas. The last thing an increasingly globalized economy needs, less than a decade removed from one of the deepest recessions in history, is a trade war.”
To schedule an interview with Medlock, contact Jeff Falk, associate director of national media relations at Rice, at firstname.lastname@example.org (mailto:email@example.com) or 713-348-6775. The Baker Institute has a radio and television studio available.
Follow the Baker Institute via Twitter @BakerInstitute (http://twitter.com/BakerInstitute) .
Follow the Center for Energy Studies via Twitter @CES_Baker_Inst (http://twitter.com/CES_Baker_Inst) .
Follow Rice News and Media Relations via Twitter @RiceUNews (http://www.twitter.com/riceunews) .
Photo credit: 123RF.com/Rice University.
Founded in 1993, Rice University’s Baker Institute ranks among the top five university-affiliated think tanks in the world. As a premier nonpartisan think tank, the institute conducts research on domestic and foreign policy issues with the goal of bridging the gap between the theory and practice of public policy. The institute’s strong track record of achievement reflects the work of its endowed fellows, Rice University faculty scholars and staff, coupled with its outreach to the Rice student body through fellow-taught classes — including a public policy course — and student leadership and internship programs. Learn more about the institute at www.bakerinstitute.org (http://www.bakerinstitute.org/) or on the institute’s blog, http://blogs.chron.com/bakerblog.
Located on a 300-acre forested campus in Houston, Rice University is consistently ranked among the nation’s top 20 universities by U.S. News & World Report. Rice has highly respected schools of Architecture, Business, Continuing Studies, Engineering, Humanities, Music, Natural Sciences and Social Sciences and is home to the Baker Institute for Public Policy. With 3,879 undergraduates and 2,861 graduate students, Rice’s undergraduate student-to-faculty ratio is 6-to-1. Its residential college system builds close-knit communities and lifelong friendships, just one reason why Rice is ranked No. 1 for quality of life and for lots of race/class interaction and No. 2 for happiest students by the Princeton Review. Rice is also rated as a best value among private universities by Kiplinger’s Personal Finance. To read “What they’re saying about Rice,” go to http://tinyurl.com/RiceUniversityoverview.
______________________ If you would rather not receive future communications from RiceUniversity2, please go to http://rice.pr-optout.com/OptOut.aspx?523718x19842x147412x1x4318702x24000x6&Email=riceuniversity%40feeds.newsroomamerica.com. RiceUniversity2, Public Affairs - MS610 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005-1827 United States